Skip to content

Module 19 min900 wordsFree — no account

A coefficient to four decimals, and 6 462.72 € less

The explanation, in the order it is meant to be read · 23 sections · 692 words · 4 min

An employee on 2 200 € gross a month costs 26 400 € of annual pay. The general reduction takes 6 462.72 € off employer contributions, nearly a quarter of that salary. Before you read on: where does that quarter come from, and why not a third?

What you will be able to do

  • Write out the formula for the general reduction coefficient.
  • Place the reference minimum wage and the annual hours used.
  • Tell apart the two values of T delta by headcount.
  • Understand the role of the exponent and of the minimum threshold.
  • Cost the reduction on a given level of pay.

One formula, five parameters

The single degressive general reduction is not read off a scale. It is computed, employee by employee, from a coefficient applied to annual gross pay.

The formula reads: coefficient = T min + T delta × [(1/2) × (3 × minimum wage computed for a year / annual gross pay − 1)] raised to the power P.

The minimum wage computed for a year equals 1 820 times the hourly amount used. That hourly amount is frozen at 12.02 €, giving an annual reference figure of 21 876.40 €.

The coefficient is rounded to four decimals, to the nearest ten-thousandth. That precision is not cosmetic: applied to a payroll, the fourth decimal still weighs a few euros per employee.

Definition

Minimum wage computed for a year — The reference base of the general reduction, equal to 1 820 times the hourly minimum wage used for the scheme, that is 21 876.40 € for an hourly amount frozen at 12.02 €. It is not the minimum wage actually paid, but a computation value.

T min, T delta and headcount

T min equals 0.0200 for every employer. It is the minimum exemption threshold, the value the coefficient converges towards as pay rises.

T delta, in contrast, depends on headcount, because it embeds the rate of the national housing aid fund contribution, which differs on either side of fifty employees.

For employers with fewer than fifty employees, liable to that contribution at 0.10 %, T delta equals 0.3781. For those with fifty employees or more, liable at 0.50 %, it equals 0.3821.

A gap of four ten-thousandths looks negligible. On the same pay of 26 400 €, it moves the coefficient from 0.2448 to 0.2472, that is some sixty euros a year per employee.

Key figures

Hourly gross minimum wage used
12.02 €
T min
0.0200
T delta, fewer than 50 employees
0.3781
T delta, 50 employees and above
0.3821

A taper that is not a straight line

The exponent P equals 1.75. It is what gives the curve its shape: the reduction does not fall linearly with pay, it drops faster at the bottom of the scale than at the top.

At the annual reference minimum wage, the bracket equals 1 and the coefficient reaches its maximum: 0.02 + 0.3781, that is 0.3981 for an employer with fewer than fifty employees.

At 26 400 €, the bracket has fallen to 0.742977; raised to the power 1.75 it weighs only 0.594, and the coefficient comes down to 0.2448. The reduction stands at 6 462.72 €.

At 40 000 €, the coefficient is no more than 0.0716 and the reduction 2 864 €. Between 26 400 € and 40 000 €, pay rose by half and the relief was divided by more than two.

The scheme's exit point sits at three times the minimum wage, that is 65 629.20 € of annual pay. Beyond that, the general reduction no longer applies.

A close reading of the formula shows that at the exit point the bracket is nil and the coefficient equals exactly T min, that is 0.0200. The scheme therefore ends on a step, not on a gradual extinction.

Mistakes to avoid

  • Using the minimum wage actually paid rather than the hourly amount frozen at 12.02 €.
  • Taking 1 607 annual hours instead of the 1 820 the formula uses.
  • Taking the under-fifty T delta for an employer above the threshold.
  • Forgetting the 1.75 exponent and reasoning on a linear taper.
  • Rounding the coefficient to two decimals instead of four.
  • Applying the reduction beyond the exit point of three times the minimum wage.

Read in French

Educational content, current with the sources cited. It does not replace advice tailored to your situation. These courses are neither certifying nor CPF-eligible: they prepare for no certification registered with the French RNCP or specific register.